A while ago (really, a while ago) I pointed out GenieKnows and how they were hiding links in blog comments using a smile emoticon.
So yesterday I ran into some news about how they had relaunched, were doing a lot of traffic, and so forth. I was very surprised myself when I saw that Compete.com showed them with 2.3 million visitors a month – not bad! Even more impressive was that all the traffic began a few months – what a spike!
Of course, things were not as they seemed. Compete is nice enough to show us a breakdown of traffic by subdomain – in this case, it seems like feed.genieknows.com was their main traffic conduit. And some simple searching brought light on their methodology: annoying spyware that hijacks your URLs.
Just wonderful stuff.
Integrating Facebook & Twitter logins on your site are not newsworthy.
I’m looking at you every single local site out there. голова болит ÑÐµÐºÑ Ð³Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð²Ð° болит ÑÐµÐºÑ download Dead Like Me голова болит ÑекÑ
I’ve been talking about shifting away from local search to local – and it boggles my mind how wasteful local is.
My favorite example are blogs for businesses. Say I like Cafe X nearby. They have a blog (or even a website). They realize that getting their information is a good idea – and so they use RSS. They may not fully get it, but they realize that RSS lets me access their information more conveniently.
Now what boggles my mind is how many of them do not use full feeds. While the real goal is to get me going to their business, because it is the web, they seem to think the ‘target’ is getting me to their website. I was already on their damn website – that is why I subscribed to the RSS feed in the first place! You damn fools – give me access to the full content immediately.
This of course extends in other ways – as an avid NBA fan, it boggles my mind that NBA.com does not use full feeds. I am going to guess they would do better to keep me more engaged (not having to click on the link), and thus more likely to attend an actual NBA game (and with the economy hit as badly as it has, it is something they are desperate for).
I can understand a professional blogger who makes his money by driving ad-views on his blog – fine. Otherwise? Use a full feed! какие виды ÑекÑа порно фото леÑбиÑнок на компьютер Ñмотреть беÑплатно порно зрелых порно фото групповуха Gary Oldman Carnegie
One of the things I enjoy about Canada is that our reliance on the SIN is far less than the US and SSN. Applying for a place to live? No SIN required. Cell phone? No SIN required. Bank? No SIN required. Etc etc.
In the US, the SSN is almost considered your ‘password’ – name, address, and SSN = access granted.
So I read this article on reverse-engineering SIN numbers daybreakers ethan hawke
and found it to be absolutely mind-boggling. The essence was using an algorithm and a botnet of 10k servers (not that большие ÑиÑьки беÑплатно порно ÑÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ±Ð»Ð¸ many), they were able to deduce the SSN of people at 47 SSNs a minute. At 24×60 minutes a day – that means over 65,000 SSNs decoded a day.
I wonder how long until some organization manages to do this on a large scale (who needs to steal laptops with sensitive information?)
So in my previous post I talked about one of my favorite companies – LDC.
Next up is Yipit. But this isn’t just about how awesome Yipit is. No no – today they launched profile pages, and in the process, further convoluted their home page. So this post is about how I would look over their site, and improve their UI and SEO.
To me, SEO is about giving the user what they want. In the case of a local search site, that relates to what they want (fishnet stockings, lava lamps, Company X, etc) and where they want it (New York City, Greenwich Village [neighborhood], 10015 [zip code], or some other informal space). It is also very possible that the user has a general idea of what they want but do not know how to exactly define it.
So – off the bat, the home page for Yipit is rather confusing. We have 1 2 3, where #1 is a non-standardized (in general UI terms) breakdown, #2 is slightly more confusing (it is pre-filled as NY – which doesn’t match either of their three criteria), and #3 is … something that should not need to be defined. Under it we have a list of Top Furniture and Top Discount Furniture stores, with a crap-ton of ‘popular searches’ that somehow relate to each business (but how?) On the right is a quick description of Yipit that seems stuffed with keywords, then twitter updates, then more popular searches, and then popular business searches.
What in God’s name of stuffing is this?
On a slight tangent – the English language can be hard. What may be X to me may be Y to you. Taxonomy is not an easy business. But the complexity in taxonomy is far simpler for Yipit – by focusing on furniture (more later), the verse of words people could be possibly looking for is greatly narrowed. Instead of a drop down – just have a box saying ‘What kind of Furniture?’ Best of all – this lets them generate a list of keywords based on what users are searching for. Eventually they may learn that 75% of people use ‘fold-out bed’ while 20% use ’sofa bed’ and 5% use ‘bed that opens up’. Sure they may miss it the first few times someone searches for it (as it would not be in their taxonomy) – but over time they would have this incredibly rich database of words people search for relating to their own internal category. Back to the topic – replace ‘Near’ with ‘Around (optional)’ and have it pre-filled with New York City. Then a simple search submit. All of them next to each other, no #s, and maybe a few examples under the two input boxes. Forcing their categorization on me was an unsatisfying UI experience.
On a related note – the ‘definitions’ link looks like it is clickable – but it sure ain’t. Confused me there.
So – now we have greatly cleaned up the main search part – no forcing a user to figure out what you think they want – let them define it, and no need for the ‘duh’ 1 2 3 #s.
Next up – we have a bunch of ‘Top Furniture Stores’ under it. First off – all the profile page links go to the generic /furniture__ny/ page – I assume that is a bug. Second of all – why do we have 900 keywords stuffed in there? Having ‘new york’ stuffed in every single result leaves me with a bad taste. You have tags for each business. You should be using those.
But never mind the tags even. You guys have two objectives here – get people to use the Yipit code, or get people to find Yipit when searching for a popular key phrase / store. At the same time, Yipit’s authority in the eyes of search engines is still weak – it is new, and does not have a few links. So – instead of 12 businesses across two categories, list 4. Two are your advertisers, and two are either the two most popular furniture stores in NYC, or two advertisers. Ideally this would let you track how effective the home page is in getting people to use the coupon, and thus the value it generates. Furthermore, just list the tags you ahve for each business. No need to put in all these extra popular searches.
Now to the right side. The first paragraph is nice, the second paragraph throws me off with all that red text for links. Is it really needed? You already have popular searches – leave it at that. As for the twitter updates – honestly how many people care about that? You have a blog link in the footer – leave it at that. Leave those popular searches and popular business searches (though really rename it to ‘Popular Businesses’) – so your right is now a quick blurb on how Yipit does furniture (but should be slightly more fleshed out), and two quick lists on Popular Searches and Popular Businesses.
And bring the nice little footer image to the top please
So – now we have a home page much nicer and cleaner.
Next up – the directory pages in the footer. They are employing a Neighborhood directory, a Zip Code directory, and a Business Directory by alphabet. The Neighborhood directory expands into a bunch of pages for every category for every neighborhood, the zip directory the same, and the business directory just straight links.
Down the road this may work. But as I said before, personally I think that is stretching it too thin. Trying to run before you can walk. If I could run things, I would nuke the zip code directory, nuke the business listings, and only use Neighborhoods. The neighborhood-specific page would then have a list of just the businesses found in that directory. They have 337 in total – no worry of having too many in one neighborhood
The profile page I cannot complain about much. I would get rid of that Search Yipit drill down they have, and replace it back with the simple What/Where search box (with the Where pre-filled with that neighborhood). And instead of Other Searches of Interest, I would simply list the 5 closest Furnituer stores. Too many keywords (at this time) seem to be spreading yourself thin.
So we finally end up with the super confusing (to me) /d/xxxxx pages. Before I get started on it specifically, I noticed some links where /d/xxxxx_ny and some were /d/xxxxxxx_NY. That is duplicate content in the eyes of some search engines.
Now – the idea is smart. Search pages or tag pages – both are the same to Yipit. But that UI is just ‘what the fuck’ to me. At 1024 res that map on teh right is so squished. And way way too much information.
For example, I am looking at Murphy Beds. I fail to see why I care what the popular searches are on that page. I want to know name, info, and yes knowing their amount is nice. But popular searches are out. They could easily wipe out that entire blue box, giving the map a lot more space. Plus – you have a map – no need to put in the intersection. I think it should be just Name, Price (clickable with a tooltip to say exactly what $$$ means), address, phone, # of pieces, and a ‘more details’ link to their profile page! (profile pages are found nowhere on the search results page).
And as I said before – please just use a free-for-all input box for what.
I know I am not the only one confused by this page – the breadcrumbs lead to nowhere.
I would also slightly tweak the
Well – I could go on more, but I am hungry for some ice cream, but this should be enough of a start. My main focus is on cleaning up the site for information not needed (or applicable at that time), and also cutting down on the # of pages they are generating. Google says they have 17k pages indexed, but whiel normally they let you see upto 1000, it tops out at 422 and deems the rest similar. And that is including the 100+ pages the blog has created.
Every time I run into another blog post that trumpets on how Chrome’s market share is down … I just shake my head at how people are confusing common sense with deep analytics.
First off, Google Chrome was a big announcement. Here was the fabled GBrowser (speaking of which, GBrowser.com goes nowhere). And what was everyone’s reaction to the browser? To rush out, get it, and try it on the web.
But what did people expect then? That every single user would start using Chrome? That a snowball effect would ensue and it would obliterate FireFox and IE’s share? That a previously untested-in-the-wild software would be perfect of any bugs? That software released currently as 0.20 was going to be flawless and take over the world? That software that Google is not even promoting publicly was going to just keep growing in market-share?
Come on people – use some common sense. There are a bunch of web-savvy people who use IE, another bunch who use FF, and another bunch who use Opera. Of course market share was going to spike up -everyone wanted to test it. And of course it was going to go down – it had bugs, it was not perfect for everyone (no browser is perfect for everyone), and it isn’t being promoted by Google at all (compared to FFs non-stop promotion and IE’s Windows ties).
As faithful readers know, I’ve been working around the clock non-stop for the past few weeks. I was supposed to meet someone for lunch yesterday, but was so exhausted I had to take a raincheck and ended up sleeping most of the afternoon.
Meanwhile there was the Traffic Conference going on across the bridge in Brooklyn. I had at least a dozen people I had wanted to meet, but with the grind on, had been unable to make it there to say hi.
So I got a message from someone demanding that I come out with him and a buddy for dinner. He hammered me until I acquiesced.
I have also started working out again after my three-month break due to Argentina. Having worked on the chest yesterday, and arms and legs today (I do A-B-break), and not being used to working out, my arms were sore.
So that sets the scene.
So I head on out in my comfy jeans and loafers, walk out the door, hear it click behind, and … oh hell, I’ve forgotten my keys. I find the super’s # on the door downstairs, give it a call … only to find out that the ’super’ really is the guy who cleans the building, and then his daughter tells me that they have no keys and that I should call Pedro. Pedro’s phone #? She doesn’t know … just call “Pedro.” Great.
Now my apartment is on the second floor, and has a fire-escape staircase.
For those that have never been on a fire-escape staircase, it is scary. In the actual space you walk across, there are just five metal bars below you, and that is it. Nothing to hold onto to your left or right. Look at the top – when you walk across that, there is no railing, and it is really thing.
Now imagine going on smooth painted metal that is slippery from constant rain, and me wearing loafers that give me zero grip.
So I climb up the ladder, up the stairs, rather uncomfortably so. And there is my office window, with the trust AC in it. I manage to raise the window (remember – my biggest concern right now is not slipping and falling into the hole), but there is not enough space for me to slip inside. Half my body is inside, the other half stuck outside.
Eventually I have one foot on the window sill, one arm holding the AC, and one arm holding the window (if it falls, it crushes me, and I fall, and I get hurt bad). All the while my dog is barking and jumping up and down like crazy, as if we are playing some great little game.
So I end up having to use my one arm, dig my fingers into the side of the AC, and lift it up and put it down (it is 3 feet off the ground and a foot ‘deep’).
Imagine it. Arms and legs sore and burning, one foot on the wet sill, one foot on the wet fire escape, one arm slowly lifting and putting down an AC by the finger tips, and one arm keeping the damn window open. Muscles completely tense and the only thought that is in my head is “If I slip let go of the AC and grab onto anything as fast as you can).
I managed to softly drop the AC, get the entire floor wet, and staggered in to live and tell my story!
Why do sites insist on having you put in your password twice? So what if a person types it in wrong?
Looking at it in another way – what is the probability a person types it in wrong? 1%? 5%?
Lets even say 5% … so why make 95% of the users suffer and make them enter a password twice when the 5% who did not type it in correctly can just reset a password?
Just a UI thought I had.
What is up with all these blogs that think they are some amazing community and feel the need to put up some forum and/or other hard-work-required community hangouts?
I was going through some popular blogs today, and about a quarter had a link to a ‘Forum.’ Odd I thought – I thought the attraction was the writers’ analysis and subsequent conversations. Incidentally, [b]every single[/b] forum was either (1) Sparsely populated or (2) Full of crap. The underlying truth for all of the blog forums was the complete absence of the person who ran the blog.
I never understand why people try to be more than they really are. Focus on who (or what) you are and be done with it. I believe we have had some interesting conversations through this blog. But the reality is that almost every single conversation here was started by me. And there are many other conversations I have taken part in on other blogs.
This isn’t narcissism – it is about reality. I visit Screewerk or Local Onliner because I want to hear what Greg or Peter think. I do care about what their readers think, but at the end of the day I subscribed to read their thoughts.
A blog just ain’t a multi-starter community.
I have 21 drafts – from DDL:08 to TagsPage.com to 19 others in between. From early January 2007 to yesterday. So much to say, so little time to articulate it …