<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google &#038; Control - Four Reasons it is getting too far</title>
	<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/</link>
	<description>Soapboxing every damn day</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AdvertiseSpace</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-7769</link>
		<dc:creator>AdvertiseSpace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-7769</guid>
		<description>Nice finally someone else willing to bash Google a bit without fear of them secretly bumping your site down a bit in the search rankings. 

Keep it coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice finally someone else willing to bash Google a bit without fear of them secretly bumping your site down a bit in the search rankings. </p>
<p>Keep it coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-3638</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 04:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-3638</guid>
		<description>Rico - I think you missed the point.

The argument here is that paid links are evil. That all links should be put by the webmaster. But the webmaster did *not* put the links to all the WP people (or even XFN). So do the links get counted? If so - why? (as they have no relevance to 99.99% of the sites linking to them). And if they do get penalized - why? Do the authors not have the right to put their name no their work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rico - I think you missed the point.</p>
<p>The argument here is that paid links are evil. That all links should be put by the webmaster. But the webmaster did *not* put the links to all the WP people (or even XFN). So do the links get counted? If so - why? (as they have no relevance to 99.99% of the sites linking to them). And if they do get penalized - why? Do the authors not have the right to put their name no their work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rico</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>Rico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>Regarding number 4: As far as I'm concerned, Matt and co. have the right to make their own blogs the default links, as they spent the time and money to make Wordpress a reality. I really don't consider their taking advantage of the platform's popularity unethical, since as the originators, they have full control over everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding number 4: As far as I&#8217;m concerned, Matt and co. have the right to make their own blogs the default links, as they spent the time and money to make Wordpress a reality. I really don&#8217;t consider their taking advantage of the platform&#8217;s popularity unethical, since as the originators, they have full control over everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Google and Control: Going too Far?&#160;by&#160;Blogging Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Google and Control: Going too Far?&#160;by&#160;Blogging Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out his reasons behind some criticisms of Google on Tech Soapbox. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Check out his reasons behind some criticisms of Google on Tech Soapbox. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abrindo as pernas? at Caveat Emptor</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>abrindo as pernas? at Caveat Emptor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2367</guid>
		<description>[...] E aproveitando o ensejo, para os que ainda acreditam naquela história de &#8220;do no evil&#8221; ou que acham que como a Google lida com seus negócios é problema só dela, recomendo este artigo. Especialmente para aqueles que precisam de propagandas e do fluxo de leitores que o serviço de busca mais usado do mundo lhes garante. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] E aproveitando o ensejo, para os que ainda acreditam naquela história de &#8220;do no evil&#8221; ou que acham que como a Google lida com seus negócios é problema só dela, recomendo este artigo. Especialmente para aqueles que precisam de propagandas e do fluxo de leitores que o serviço de busca mais usado do mundo lhes garante. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Langdon</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2336</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2336</guid>
		<description>Google is evil.  Google, Microsft and Yahoo won't allow me to advertise my webiste, www.chinaisevil.com, IN THE US, because it is critical of Communist China!  The mainstream media loves the Googliars and won't cover this story.

            Chris Langdon, qiology@aol.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is evil.  Google, Microsft and Yahoo won&#8217;t allow me to advertise my webiste, <a href="http://www.chinaisevil.com," rel="nofollow">http://www.chinaisevil.com,</a> IN THE US, because it is critical of Communist China!  The mainstream media loves the Googliars and won&#8217;t cover this story.</p>
<p>            Chris Langdon, <a href="mailto:qiology@aol.com">qiology@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nova</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>nova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>Watch the Co-Founder of Google, Sergey Brin, talking about various aspects of Search Engines: Technology, Society, and Business. 

Here's the website: 

http://www.thoughtware.tv/site/show/331</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch the Co-Founder of Google, Sergey Brin, talking about various aspects of Search Engines: Technology, Society, and Business. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the website: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thoughtware.tv/site/show/331" rel="nofollow">http://www.thoughtware.tv/site/show/331</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>Great post.  If anything has spammed the internet in the last couple years it has been adsense. 

So, Google can have their adsense links on everyone sites, but webmasters aren't able to make their own money through advertising links? yeah... whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  If anything has spammed the internet in the last couple years it has been adsense. </p>
<p>So, Google can have their adsense links on everyone sites, but webmasters aren&#8217;t able to make their own money through advertising links? yeah&#8230; whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>Google has done some great stuff - I love Google Webmasters. Sitemaps, etc etc.

I just believe this is over-reaching - there are too many gray-area issues that they seem to be sweeping under the rug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has done some great stuff - I love Google Webmasters. Sitemaps, etc etc.</p>
<p>I just believe this is over-reaching - there are too many gray-area issues that they seem to be sweeping under the rug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mong</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>Mong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/google-control-four-reasons-it-is-getting-too-far/#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>Google is trying to get control over breath of webmasters. Google is lucky that Yahoo! and Live are poor players. Though at the end we (webmasters) would pay the price :((</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is trying to get control over breath of webmasters. Google is lucky that Yahoo! and Live are poor players. Though at the end we (webmasters) would pay the price :((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
