<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paid Reviews: 99% Crap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/</link>
	<description>Soapboxing every damn day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Best of Feeds - 45 links - blogging, business, startup, career, tips &#171; Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-8425</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of Feeds - 45 links - blogging, business, startup, career, tips &#171; Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/#comment-8425</guid>
		<description>[...] [PPP/REVIEWME] Paid Reviews: 99% Crap (techsoapbox.com, 2 saves) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [PPP/REVIEWME] Paid Reviews: 99% Crap (techsoapbox.com, 2 saves) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-7420</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/#comment-7420</guid>
		<description>Zany - this isn&#039;t about professionalism (in the sense of the overall blog). I&#039;m not expecting Darren Rowse. My two main points simply are:

1. Ignoring requirements. Many bloggers apply for any and all reviews. They may have zero knowledge on that subject. It may have nothing to do with what their blog is about. I put simple requirements, and so many bloggers ignored them that they aren&#039;t the exception - they are the rule.

2. Quality. I&#039;m talking about blogs full of paid reviews. Sure, put in a paid review if you want to. I don&#039;t have a problem with that. But when 75%+ of blog posts are reviewed posts, that isn&#039;t a blog - it is just an advertisement masked as a blog. And when most of the blogs are like that (chock full of reviewed posts) - then they are simply crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zany &#8211; this isn&#8217;t about professionalism (in the sense of the overall blog). I&#8217;m not expecting Darren Rowse. My two main points simply are:</p>
<p>1. Ignoring requirements. Many bloggers apply for any and all reviews. They may have zero knowledge on that subject. It may have nothing to do with what their blog is about. I put simple requirements, and so many bloggers ignored them that they aren&#8217;t the exception &#8211; they are the rule.</p>
<p>2. Quality. I&#8217;m talking about blogs full of paid reviews. Sure, put in a paid review if you want to. I don&#8217;t have a problem with that. But when 75%+ of blog posts are reviewed posts, that isn&#8217;t a blog &#8211; it is just an advertisement masked as a blog. And when most of the blogs are like that (chock full of reviewed posts) &#8211; then they are simply crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Posting Sponsored Reviews Means Selling Out? &#171; Bona Fide</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-7419</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Posting Sponsored Reviews Means Selling Out? &#171; Bona Fide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/#comment-7419</guid>
		<description>[...] Posting Sponsored Reviews Means Selling&#160;Out?  An interesting rant I found talks about the quality of both the blogs and the companies involved in sponsored reviews. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posting Sponsored Reviews Means Selling&nbsp;Out?  An interesting rant I found talks about the quality of both the blogs and the companies involved in sponsored reviews. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZanyNenk</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-7418</link>
		<dc:creator>ZanyNenk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/#comment-7418</guid>
		<description>I think you totally exaggerating. You forget that most bloggers are not professionals. They are into making some dollars off of their blog, and your ethics don&#039;t really bother them much - and they shouldn&#039;t. The review is out there -- the link is alive -- the money is well earned. That&#039;s all there&#039;s to it.

You can&#039;t ask everybody to be like Darren Rowse. So take it easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you totally exaggerating. You forget that most bloggers are not professionals. They are into making some dollars off of their blog, and your ethics don&#8217;t really bother them much &#8211; and they shouldn&#8217;t. The review is out there &#8212; the link is alive &#8212; the money is well earned. That&#8217;s all there&#8217;s to it.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t ask everybody to be like Darren Rowse. So take it easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of Feeds - 45 links - blogging, business, startup, career, tips &#171; //engtech - internet duct tape</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of Feeds - 45 links - blogging, business, startup, career, tips &#171; //engtech - internet duct tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 17:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/#comment-3962</guid>
		<description>[...] [PPP/REVIEWME] Paid Reviews: 99% Crap (techsoapbox.com, 2 saves) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [PPP/REVIEWME] Paid Reviews: 99% Crap (techsoapbox.com, 2 saves) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Sharing: 5/17/07 &#187; Webomatica - tech, movies, music blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Sharing: 5/17/07 &#187; Webomatica - tech, movies, music blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/#comment-3853</guid>
		<description>[...] Paid Reviews Are Lame: And most blogs are poo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paid Reviews Are Lame: And most blogs are poo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech.Chick.Blog &#187; links for 2007-05-15</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-3768</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech.Chick.Blog &#187; links for 2007-05-15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 12:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsoapbox.com/paid-reviews-99-crap/#comment-3768</guid>
		<description>[...] Paid Reviews: 99% Crap - Tech Soapbox In an effort to save even more time - Sponsored Posts allows you to create an â€˜opportunityâ€™ and let bloggers bid. You donâ€™t even need to go looking for them now (both SR and ReviewMe have medicore search capabilities). While they were originally de (tags: blogging, pay-per-post, ads, advertising) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paid Reviews: 99% Crap &#8211; Tech Soapbox In an effort to save even more time &#8211; Sponsored Posts allows you to create an â€˜opportunityâ€™ and let bloggers bid. You donâ€™t even need to go looking for them now (both SR and ReviewMe have medicore search capabilities). While they were originally de (tags: blogging, pay-per-post, ads, advertising) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
