<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Latest form of Digg Spam</title>
	<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/the-latest-form-of-digg-spam/</link>
	<description>Soapboxing every damn day</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt C</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/the-latest-form-of-digg-spam/#comment-23983</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/the-latest-form-of-digg-spam/#comment-23983</guid>
		<description>It doesn't look like Google is giving much weight to those 800 links.  The two sites appear to have a PageRank of 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t look like Google is giving much weight to those 800 links.  The two sites appear to have a PageRank of 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/the-latest-form-of-digg-spam/#comment-23883</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/the-latest-form-of-digg-spam/#comment-23883</guid>
		<description>1000 links? Not all that much.

Ehab - your question doesn't have a simple answer. It isn't just about quantity, but also quality. So 800 backlinks from a high end site (digg.com) is better than 800 comment spam links. But 800 backlinks from one large site (digg.com) are not as good as 800 varied backlinks from various sites.

Link generation is almost an art-form: http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/advsearch?p=http%3A%2F%2Fweather.ibegin.com%2F&#38;bwm=i&#38;bwmo=d&#38;bwmf=s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1000 links? Not all that much.</p>
<p>Ehab - your question doesn&#8217;t have a simple answer. It isn&#8217;t just about quantity, but also quality. So 800 backlinks from a high end site (digg.com) is better than 800 comment spam links. But 800 backlinks from one large site (digg.com) are not as good as 800 varied backlinks from various sites.</p>
<p>Link generation is almost an art-form: <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/advsearch?p=http%3A%2F%2Fweather.ibegin.com%2F&amp;bwm=i&amp;bwmo=d&amp;bwmf=s" rel="nofollow">http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/advsearch?p=http%3A%2F%2Fweather.ibegin.com%2F&amp;bwm=i&amp;bwmo=d&amp;bwmf=s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehab</title>
		<link>http://www.techsoapbox.com/the-latest-form-of-digg-spam/#comment-23848</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 05:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techsoapbox.com/the-latest-form-of-digg-spam/#comment-23848</guid>
		<description>HOLY MOUSES ! Did you just see that ? I have never seen so many backlinks from a single domain. 

But thats the question. Does 800 backlinks from the same domain make any difference to 800 backlinks from 800 different domains ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOLY MOUSES ! Did you just see that ? I have never seen so many backlinks from a single domain. </p>
<p>But thats the question. Does 800 backlinks from the same domain make any difference to 800 backlinks from 800 different domains ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
